High Fructose Corn Syrup Propaganda:

Corn Refining Industry Lays on the High Fructose Corn Syrup Propaganda As Thick As... Well, Syrup

"Experts lay to rest long-held misconceptions about high fructose corn syrup"

Corresponding Journal of Nutrition supplement urges health professionals to help reduce consumer confusion *

* Editor's note: Wow, check out the above title of this press release... Here's the translation: "We're the experts, HFCS is fine, don't listen to laymen idiots on the Internet, don't get confused!" I bet you've seen the same commercials as I have extolling high fructose corn syrup while cleverly and fallaciously not addressing any of the real facts about why HFCS is some real bad voodoo. In case you haven't seen the largest United States agribusiness's attempt to overtly brainwash you, let me catch you up with this press release... and if you start to get sick before you finish, just scroll on down to the bottom for additional editorial commentary...

WASHINGTON, DC – A supplement to be published in the June issue of the Journal of Nutrition encourages the scientific community and the general public to stop demonizing high fructose corn syrup as the culprit of obesity and to rethink the myths about high fructose corn syrup's impact on the American diet.

"The State of the Science on Dietary Sweeteners Containing Fructose" is the scientific summary of a joint conference held in March 2008 by the International Life Sciences Institute of North America and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Several scientific papers from the supplement are currently available online.

The conference brought together several scientific leaders from varying backgrounds, including former critics of high fructose corn syrup, who found there is little evidence that high fructose corn syrup and sugar (or sucrose) have differing effects on satiety, overall energy balance, metabolic hormones or biochemical metabolites such as triglycerides and uric acid – all suggesting no unique causal role for high fructose corn syrup in obesity.

According to Suzanne P. Murphy, Ph.D., R.D., research professor at the Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, noted in her summary of the presented papers, "…[high fructose corn syrup] and sucrose are similar and one is not 'better or worse' than the other."

Dr. Murphy notes that "it does not appear to be practical to base dietary guidance on selecting or avoiding these specific types of sweeteners."

High Fructose Corn Syrup Is Not the Same as Fructose

Confusion about high fructose corn syrup has been fueled in part by erroneous links to research testing high levels of pure fructose, and then generalizing those findings to high fructose corn syrup. The conference experts concluded that studies testing pure fructose at levels not seen in the typical diet are simply misleading in terms of understanding the metabolism of high fructose corn syrup. High fructose corn syrup never contains fructose alone. Rather, just like sugar, high fructose corn syrup is comprised of roughly equivalent amounts of fructose and glucose.

"These peer-reviewed papers expose the confusion about high fructose corn syrup: it is a case of mistaken identity between two sweeteners," said Audrae Erickson, president of the Corn Refiners Association. "High fructose corn syrup is not high in fructose, but rather has roughly half fructose and half glucose, just like sugar – therefore, it should come as no surprise that high fructose corn syrup and sugar are metabolized the same way in our bodies."

Increased Caloric Intake, Not a Single Sweetener, the Likely Cause of Obesity

Fructose-containing sweeteners— such as sugar, invert sugar, honey, fruit juice concentrates and high fructose corn syrup—are essentially interchangeable in composition, calories and metabolism. Replacing high fructose corn syrup in foods with other fructose-containing sweeteners will provide neither improved nutrition nor a meaningful solution to the obesity crisis. "In light of similarities in composition, sweetness, energy content, processing and metabolism, claims that such sweetener substitutions bring nutritional benefit to children and their families appear disingenuous and misleading," concluded John S. White, Ph.D., caloric sweetener expert and president of White Technical Research.

Since the introduction of high fructose corn syrup 35 years ago, calories from added sugars (mostly sucrose and high fructose corn syrup) increased at a slower rate than calories from all sources. With high fructose corn syrup use in decline since 1999, it is far more likely, writes Dr. White, that this increase in total calories was due to Americans eating more of everything.

White urges more care in interpreting experimental data that claim to demonstrate metabolic effects for fructose-containing sweeteners. "It is inappropriate to extrapolate experimental outcomes derived from pure fructose or pure glucose, or from experiments in which fructose exceeds 10% of total energy," wrote White. "The misinterpretation of such studies as cautions against moderate dietary fructose and high fructose corn syrup use is simply not justified."

Growing Body of Evidence

The American Medical Association in June 2008 helped put to rest a common misunderstanding about high fructose corn syrup and obesity, stating that "high fructose syrup does not appear to contribute to obesity more than other caloric sweeteners." Even former critics of high fructose syrup dispelled myths and distanced themselves from earlier speculation about the sweetener's link to obesity in a comprehensive scientific review published in the December 2008 American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.


CRA is the national trade association representing the corn refining (wet milling) industry of the United States. CRA and its predecessors have served this important segment of American agribusiness since 1913. Corn refiners manufacture sweeteners, ethanol, starch, bioproducts, corn oil, and feed products from corn components such as starch, oil, protein, and fiber.

Editor's note: Once again, major corporations have demonstrated just how easy it is to buy science, scientists, and "experts." And I'm not surprised at all to find the AMA again in the pocket of a global conglomeration that's contributing to the deterioration of the general population's health.

Let's get down to brass tacks. Here is what HFCS actually is:

HFCS is produced by processing corn starch to yield glucose, and then processing the glucose to create a syrup that is usually about 45 percent fructose and 55 percent glucose.

Since sucrose (cane sugar) consists of one molecule of glucose and one molecule of fructose (i.e., 50 percent each), you'd think its effects would be similar to those of HFCS. But sucrose behaves very differently in the body, compared with glucose, fructose, or HFCS.

Conversely, the body’s digestion, absorption, and metabolism of fructose differ from the ways it digests, absorbs, and metabolizes glucose or sucrose. (Craig Weatherby)

HFCS is not a naturally occurring substance. It's a highly processed, man-made food additive that's produced in mass quantities and cheaper to use than cane sugar. And in the US, thanks primarily to Nixon and his corn subsidies in the 1970s, it's practically in everything that comes in a bottle, box, or any packaging that's not a peel or shell.

Calling high fructose corn syrup or sweetener "natural" is like calling monosodium glutamate (MSG) a substance that drops off a tree and can be popped into the mouth as is like a cherry.

So HFCS may or may not be a leading cause of obesity. Big fat deal. This is a ploy designed to make you believe the 3-ton elephant in the room is no longer there.

Don't let them distract you from that elephant, which represents this: high fructose corn syrup is the cornerstone of junk food and sodas. I'll go out on a limb and call it the mother of modern processed food, the DNA of prepackaged goods, the key ingredient in the alchemy of America's obsession with unhealthy, fast food. It's a cheap commodity and some very powerful governments, corporations, and people have been deeply invested in it for decades.

Junk food is not good for you. Have you ever seen the movie Supersize Me, where a guy lives solely off McDonald's food for a month? Yeah. Even if you haven't seen it, you can imagine what kind of shape he was in at the end of the month.

But what do I know, right? I'm no "expert" or "scientist." I'm like the mom of the little girl in the clip below, which is the trailer to the movie Thank You for Smoking -- a film about the life of a lobbyist for Big Tobacco.

Anyone else getting deja vu?

Disclaimer: Throughout this entire website, statements are made pertaining to the properties and/or functions of food and/or nutritional products. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and these materials and products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.