[Note
from Chet: People on the deficient, low-fat and low-protein Hallelujah
or Genesis 1:29 Diet often have problems similiar to those described in
this article. Click here to learn
about crashing on the Hallelujah Diet.]
Richard
Allen knew something was very wrong. In the late 1980s, the graphic designer and
father of two suffered a heart attack at the age of 35. Thankful that he survived,
Richard followed his doctor’s instructions to the letter to avoid another heart
attack and to avoid making a widow of his wife.
“I
did everything they told me. I took my medications religiously. I exercised more.
And I followed a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet. I stopped eating eggs (too much
cholesterol). I cut back on meat and trimmed all the fat off what little meat
I did allow myself. I started eating more fruits, vegetables, and whole grains
and avoided butter. It was not exactly the tastiest diet, but I figured I was
helping to preserve my health, so it was worth it.”
In
1995, however, something unexpected happened:
“I
went in for a routine check-up and some blood was drawn for some tests. I was
stunned to find out that my blood sugar levels were extremely high and I was subsequently
diagnosed with adult-onset diabetes. I was dumbfounded. I had done everything
they told me. I thought I was living and eating healthy and here I was a diabetic
who now needed to take a new set of medications for a new disease.”
Several
years later, his blood sugar elevated and recalcitrant, Richard was taken off
the oral diabetes meds and put on injection insulin--all the while following the
dietary advice he’d been told would make and keep him healthy. Frustrated, confused,
and overweight, Richard ran into an old friend who had recently changed her diet
to include more animal fats and meat and exclude most grains, starchy vegetables,
sugar and junk food. The friend had seen marked improvements in her and her family’s
health and invited Richard to a picnic near Sydney, Australia, put on by people
following the Optimal Diet, a high-fat, low carbohydrate diet developed
by a Polish medical doctor.
Intrigued,
Richard attended and met several of the diet’s devotees, as well as a visiting
naturopath who successfully utilised low-carb diets in his practice, and Dr. Bogdan
Sikorski, a pharmacologist/ toxicologist. Collectively, they answered Richard’s
questions and testified enthusiastically as to the diet’s effectiveness for a
number of conditions, including heart disease and diabetes. After meeting with
a Polish medical doctor who was on the Optimal Diet himself, Richard
decided to abandon his low-fat/high carb diet (“What good had it done me anyway?”
Richard exclaimed) and adopt a completely different way of eating.
NOT
JUST FOR WEIGHT LOSS
Richard’s
story is not unusual. In recent years, there has been an explosion of lay and
professional interest in low-carb diets. The public, disillusioned with the supposed
effectiveness of low-fat diets and facing ever-climbing rates of obesity and diabetes,
have been embracing starch-free diets in droves. Though the diet has been mostly
associated with weight loss, practitioners and scientists alike are discovering
the benefits of low-carb diets for a number of diseases--from multiple sclerosis
to diabetes.
Low-carb
diets are nothing new. Throughout history writers such as Anthelme Savarin (1),
William Banting (2), Vilhjamur Stefansson (3), and Weston Price (4), in one way
or another, all advocated lower carb diets. In more recent times, Drs. Richard
Mackarness (5) and John Yudkin (6) both authored books espousing a lower carbohydrate
intake. It is only in recent years, however, that the low-carb diet has achieved
such wide and sustained popularity.
Myths
about low-carb diets abound and this article will deal with several of them. It
is important for readers to know that the low-carb craze is a true phenomenon,
encompassing many writers and many approaches. Though each differs from the other
in slight ways, the bottom line is this: To be healthy, humans need to reduce
their intake of carbohydrates in any form and increase their intake of protein
and fats, especially animal fats. The following is a summary survey of the various
approaches to low-carb nutrition. Despite their critics, low-carb proponents stand
by their nutritional recommendations as healthy and vibrant.
DR.
ROBERT ATKINS
The
most famous populariser of low-carb diets has been American medical doctor, Robert
Atkins. His book, Dr. Atkins’ Diet Revolution, was first published in 1970
and has sold millions of copies. The latest revision was released in 2002 under
the title Dr. Atkins’ New Diet Revolution (Avon Books; 2002). Unlike earlier
versions of the book, the latest revision is heavily referenced, thus ending frequent
criticisms that his diet theories have no scientific basis.
Atkins’
approach to weight loss is simple: Reducing your carbohydrate intake to less than
40 gms a day will induce ketosis/lipolysis in the body, a condition where
the body breaks down fat instead of glucose for energy, resulting in weight loss.
The allowable foods are unlimited amounts of meats, fats, cheeses, non-starchy
vegetables, and limited amounts of nuts and low-carb fruits such as strawberries
and blueberries. Off-limits are honey, sugar in any form, breads, grains, and
all starchy vegetables like potatoes.
In
Atkins’, and other low-carbers view, excessive amounts of carbohydrates stimulate
excessive insulin release by the pancreas. Insulin is the hormone that carries
sugars into our cells for use. It is also the fat-storing hormone and excessive
levels lead to obesity and a host of other hormonal imbalances which in turn lead
to a plethora of degenerative diseases. If insulin levels remain high, due to
excessive amounts of carbs in the diet, ketosis/lipolysis cannot occur.
Ketosis/lipolysis,
then, is the key to weight loss on the Atkins’ diet. Atkins explains: “The Atkins
Nutritional Approach stimulates the process of lipolysis [which is] burning your
fat for energy. A secondary process of lipolysis is ketosis. Ketosis occurs when
you are taking in a low level of carbohydrates from the food you eat . . . .Lipolysis
results in the creation of ketones (ketosis), a perfectly normal and natural function
of the body.” (7) Ketones can be used as energy by the body, including the brain.
Atkins
has always been criticized about ketosis--dieticians claim that it is a dangerous
state for the body to be in. It is well-known that during starvation, the body
will enter ketosis and break down fat for energy. Diabetics can also enter ketosis,
leading to bodily acidosis, a life-threatening state. The two conditions, however,
are not alike as will be explained later in this article.
Dr.
Atkins has propounded his philosophy of low-carb living in other books, not related
to weight loss, most notably Dr. Atkins’ Age-Defying Diet (St. Martin’s
Paperbacks; 2001). In this title, he applies lower-carb diets to improving longevity.
In his non-weight loss approach, Atkins allows more carbs per day (40+ gms), but
still recommends that daily intake should not exceed about 100 gms or 400 calories.
Atkins
has been criticised by establishment nutritionists and some medical doctors for
promoting a diet that, because it is high in animal fat and protein, will lead
to heart disease and other diseases (dealt with later in this article). Curiously,
critics also accuse the diet as not including vegetables--something which is clearly
false if you read the recipes included in the books.
Atkins
has also been criticised by other low-carbers for not emphasising food quality
on the diet and for using various artificial sweeteners in several of his food
products. Atkins also has added a line of processed soy products to his diet.
It is the carbohydrate-free soy protein powder that allows him to create starch-free
breads and energy bars. Critics point out that processed soy products could be
harmful to the immune, digestive, and endocrine systems (8).
Criticisms
aside, a recent study revealed the effectiveness of the Atkins Diet (and by extension,
all low-carb nutritional approaches) for weight loss, especially in comparison
to its polar opposite: the low-fat, high-carb diet. The multicenter study showed
that the Atkins Dieters had more weight loss, more adherence to the diet, and
better blood lipid profiles than the low-fat, high-carb dieters (9).
BARRY
GROVES & THE CALORIE FALLACY
In
the United Kingdom, another low-carb approach has been espoused by engineer and
author Barry Groves, PhD. Speaking from his English home, Dr. Groves recounted
his experiences over the years with low-carb diets:
“My
interest in nutrition and its effects on health really began in 1962 when I was
working in Singapore with the Royal Air Force. We had a problem, my wife and I
-- we were overweight. Since our marriage in 1957, each of us had gained nearly
13 kilos (28 lbs). We had tried all the usual ways to lose weight: cutting calories,
eating inert fillers, taking appetite suppressants, wearing sweaty clothes, indeed
we tried just about every weight-loss idea going -- with results that were decidedly
short-term.
“The
first moment of revelation came, sudden and unexpected, when I was walking through
the bustling Changi Market. I saw a second-hand bookstall and, as I am an inveterate
browser, stopped to see what was on offer. One small paperback stood out. It was
called Eat Fat and Grow Slim by Dr Richard Mackarness. That book changed
our lives -- and our figures -- for good.
“The
book advocated what we thought was impossible: an unrestricted-calorie diet for
weight loss. It said in so many words: eat as many calories as you like, and the
pounds will fall away. Because this proposition seemed so out of keeping with
all we had read up to that time, we decided to see what it could do for us. To
our astonishment, it worked -- and it has gone on working now for forty years.
“Then
the questions began: If an unrestricted-calorie diet can achieve such results,
why are all the books and magazine articles in favour of calorie-controlled diets?
I began my research and the answers came. All the evidence I found persuaded me
that low-calorie dieting is a snare for the overweight and a delusion for all
concerned. As I read on and on, it dawned on me that a vast 'health' industry
made a very good living out of the business of offering expensive solutions for
the problems, so they said, of keeping ourselves slim and fit. All those advertisements
on television -- eat this special food, try that diet -- could they have anything
to do with the profit motive?
“Later
we began to hear that the diet we had been following, which was relatively high
in animal fat, might be dangerous in terms of increased risk of heart disease.
And so, when I retired from the Royal Air Force in 1982, I devoted myself full-time
to a literature search into the healthiness of 'healthy eating'. I started with
the biggie -- fats, cholesterol and heart disease. I read everything I could find:
the studies and learned papers; the follow-up letters and studies that they referred
to, and so on. All too soon I found that, contrary to the dogma trotted out in
newspapers and magazines, radio and TV, there is little evidence to show that
'healthy eating' is good for any aspect of health.
“I
had started to give talks in 1971 about my experience with slimming on a high-fat
diet to any group that would listen. In the 1980s I extended these talks to include
other diseases and, at the same time, began to write articles and my first book:
Diet and Be Damned. The publishers, Hodder-Headline, were interested but
told me that this book was too important for publication by an unknown author.
They suggested I write a slimming diet book first. The Calorie Fallacy
was published in 1994. Another publisher, Vermilion (an imprint of Random House),
asked me to write a similar book for them and published my Eat Fat, Get Thin!
in 2000. Both these books were aimed at a lay readership.
“Now
in my mid sixties, after forty years of eating a low-carbohydrate, high-fat diet,
I weigh 3kg (7 lbs) less than I did when I married and my wife is 7 kg (15 lbs)
lighter. I also seem remarkably fit for my age. I took up archery in 1982 at the
age of forty-six as a social outlet. In all I have taken twenty British Records
in Target, Clout, and Flight archery, plus eleven international Gold Medals and
four World Records. This, despite the fact that I take very little exercise as,
for the last thirteen years I have spent most of my day sitting in front of a
computer. I attribute this to my diet too as it is well documented that Eskimoes,
on a high-fat diet, do not lose muscle tone when they retire to their igloos during
the protracted Arctic winters.”
Over
the years, Groves has seen the low-carb diet help with a wide range of conditions
besides weight loss including gastrointestinal disorders, migraines, eczema, psoriasis,
arthritis, autoimmune diseases like lupus, heart disease, even multiple sclerosis.
LIFE
WITHOUT BREAD
Life
Without Bread (Keats Publishing; 2000) is mostly based on the clinical experience
of Dr. Wolfgang Lutz, an Austrian medical doctor who successfully used low-carb
diets for decades on thousands of patients. The results of Lutz’ clinical successes
have been published in several European medical journals (mostly in German) and
he even authored a German version of LWB as far back as 1967 to good response
(the book is now in its 6th edition). His work, however, was ignored
in the English-speaking countries. After many years, with the help of American
biochemist Dr. Christian Allan, Lutz succeeded in securing an American publisher
and the results of his experience and research are now available to all English-speaking
people.
In
Lutz and Allan’s definition, the low-carb diet should include no more than 72
gms of carbohydrates a day. The rest of the diet should be made up of protein
and fat from a range of plant and animal sources. In sharp contrast to other low-carb
books, Allan and Lutz discuss the effectiveness of low-carb nutrition in treating
and preventing several diseases such as cancer, heart disease, diabetes, colitis,
and Crohn’s disease. Obesity is also dealt with, but is not the main focus of
the book.
Lutz
and Allan assert, “We’ve presented powerful evidence that the low-fat theory of
nutrition has not fulfilled its promise, and that low-carbohydrate nutrition is
a valuable tool in the fight against disease. This alternative to the fat theory
is based not only on clinical information from over ten thousand patients in Dr.
Lutz’ practice, but also on basic biochemical facts and large amounts of published
research data from many scientists and medical researchers throughout the world.”
(10)
In
their meticulously referenced book, Allan and Lutz explain exactly how excessive
carbohydrate intake negatively impacts the body’s hormonally-controlled metabolic
processes. Metabolism is a delicate equilibrium between anabolism (processes that
build up and repair) and catabolism (processes that break down). “Too much carbohydrate
in the diet disrupts the balancing act between anabolic and catabolic forces because
it sends too much insulin into the blood. Since the body will always move to balance
anabolic and catabolic reactions, increases in insulin must be dealt with in some
way.” (11)
That
“way” is for the body to reduce its output of other anabolic hormones such as
human growth hormone (needed to stimulate tissue repair and growth), and increase
its output of catabolic hormones such as various corticosteroids (which can weaken
the immune system). The consequences should be obvious: Chronically elevated insulin
levels disrupt the entire endocrine system, leading to decreased tissue repair
(from lack of growth hormone), reduced sexual function (from lack of sexual hormones),
poor immune function, and insulin resistance.
The
term “insulin resistance” is mentioned frequently in low-carb literature. It refers
to our cells’ inability to respond to insulin. Insulin is the hormone that shuttles
glucose into our cells. It can do this by attaching to certain receptors on the
cell wall. But when the receptors are full, the insulin/glucose cannot get in,
leading to higher blood sugar and insulin levels. Over time, the elevations lead
to hormonal imbalances which lead to the long-term damages mentioned above. The
cell receptors get full by being clogged up with fat--the result of excess carbohydrates
(not fat!) in the diet being converted into triglycerides (fat) by the liver.
Sometimes, “insulin resistance” and its cluster of associated conditions, is referred
to as “Syndrome X.”
Allan
and Lutz spend a considerable portion of their book debunking many of the myths
surrounding low-carb nutrition. A theme running through the book is that saturated
fats, found primarily in fats of animal origin, are not the villains modern nutrition
makes them out to be.
The
final chapter of LWB is also unique to the low-carb nutrition books available.
It shows how to implement the low-carb eating plan in various people. Lutz and
Allan wisely point out that older patients need to be eased into the program over
a period of time, as opposed to jumping into it cold-turkey. They point out the
possible health hazards of such an approach. This chapter is invaluable for clinicians.
THE
OPTIMAL DIET
Polish
medical doctor Jan Kwasniewski is credited with developing the so-called “Optimal
Diet,” a high animal fat, moderate protein, low-carb diet. “JK,” as he is referred
to by his followers, has authored numerous books in Polish on his research; a
cookbook is also available. Two English translations of his books are currently
available, the most recent being Homo Optimus, which contains recipes and the
clinical effects of the Optimal Diet on a variety of diseases. (12)
The
Optimal Diet differs from other low-carb approaches in that it maintains fairly
strict ratios of the macronutrients in its meals. Dr. Bogdan Sikorski, a pharmacologist
and toxicologist and translator of Homo Optimus, explains the salient features
of JK’s approach:
“The
so-called ‘Kwasniewski Diet’ also known as the ‘Optimal Nutrition’ (ON) was developed
over 30 years ago in Poland by Jan Kwasniewski, MD, and over the years it has
been implemented by well over a million (some say two million) people in that
country, in treatment and prevention of a range of diseases.
“In
contrast to other low-carbate dietary regimens, this nutritional model dictates
the exact proportion between the three main food components, protein, fat and
carbate (1:2.5-3(min):0.8, respectively), which has to be achieved on a daily
basis in order to obtain claimed health benefits. Therefore, unlike all other
ad-hoc dietary low-carbate models, ON strictly controls daily intake of not only
the “offending” sugars but also the intake of protein, the excess of which is
also known to be detrimental to health. Most importantly, both fats and proteins
should be biochemically as close as possible to those found in the human body,
i.e., they have to be obtained from animal products. They should also contain
a full complement of micronutrients, with products such as eggs, fatty bone broths,
organ meats and pork fat being the most prominent examples.” (13)
JK
has operated a health clinic called Arkadia for many years in Poland, with visitors
from across Europe with a host of degenerative diseases. “I saw miracles happening
there,” said an Australian medical doctor who emigrated from Poland. “It was simply
unbelievable!” Optimal Diet support groups exist in Poland, the USA, and Australia--details
can be found on the groups’ website listed at the end of this article.
Despite
the diet’s clinical success (numerous testimonials can be found on the groups’
website), the Optimal Diet and JK have been officially condemned by the Polish
medical authorities. In his response to the pronouncement, JK pointed out the
unwillingness of the Polish medical board to even consider his careful clinical
records, something he has been pushing for over the years.
OTHER
VOICES
California-based
endocrinologist Dr. Diana Schwarzbein, MD, and author of the best-selling The
Schwarzbein Principle (14), is another proponent of low-carb diets. Schwarzbein’s
work with type two diabetics convinced her that the high-carb, low-fat diet pushed
by most medical and nutritional authorities was a recipe for disease, including
diabetes. As with Allan and Lutz, Schwarzbein exonerates naturally saturated fats
of the evils attributed to them by the establishment. Her easy-to-read and well-referenced
book contains numerous case histories and includes a substantial recipe section.
Watch for the revision of The Schwarzbein Principle due out in September 2002.
American
nutritional psychologist Julia Ross, MA, has written her own low-carb friendly
book The Diet Cure (15). Though not specifically a low-carb book, Ross’ work definitely
leans towards a lower carb diet in helping to balance brain chemistry and maintain
health.
Ray
Audette, another American, has authored Neanderthin (16) which espouses a lower-carb
diet that excludes all grains, dairy, and processed sugars. Audette, once stricken
with rheumatoid arthritis, cured himself with the diet.
Medical
doctors Michael and Mary Eades have authored two books espousing the low-carb
approach, not just for weight loss but for a host of degenerative diseases and
a way of living, too. Protein Power (17) and The Protein Power Lifeplan (18) encompass
the Eades’ philosophy and approach. As with Schwarzbein, the Eades’ work grew
out of their clinical experience with patients: What they learned in medical school
about diet and disease did not match up with their results with patients.
Nutritionists
Ann Louise Gittleman (19) and Robert Crayhon (20) have also made their literary
contributions to the low-carb movement.
DANGERS?
Despite
the clinical and biochemical evidence supporting the use of low-carb diets, most
medical doctors and dieticians feel that such diets are dangerous. The specific
fears center around misunderstandings about ketosis and mistaken ideas about the
supposed dangers of animal fats and protein.
When
used as a weight loss program, low-carb diets (when carb intake is less than 40
gms a day) result in ketosis, a process wherein the body breaks down fat for energy.
It is claimed that this state is harmful and can lead to metabolic acidosis and
death. While it is true that ketosis occurs in people who are starving to death
as the body struggles to find fuel sources, it should be obvious that starving
people and low-carb people are not in the same situation as the latter have abundant
access to food, while the former do not. Diabetics can also enter a state called
ketoacidosis, but this condition results from out of control blood sugar levels
brought on by excessive carbohydrate intake. Again, this situation is not analogous
to those following a low-carb diet (21).
Critics
also accuse low-carb diets of promoting heart disease and cancer. The reason for
this is that low-carb diets are invariably high in animal fat and meat and it
is believed that these contribute to these illnesses. But several researchers
have shown that naturally saturated fats do not contribute to heart disease (22).
For example, an Indian study of over one million male railway workers found that
the meat-eating ones had a heart disease rate eight times less than the vegetarian
ones who ate much less saturated fat (23). Swedish medical doctor and chemist
Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD, has authored The Cholesterol Myths (24) which exhaustively
debunks the belief that naturally saturated fats or cholesterol cause heart disease.
The
idea that animal fats or protein foods like red meat cause cancer is also an idea
that is not true. Lipid biochemist Mary Enig, PhD, and her colleagues have shown
that cancer rates correlate more closely with refined vegetable oil and trans-fatty
acid intake from foods like margarine and vegetable shortening, not with animal
fats (25). An exhaustive review paper by Australian researchers showed conclusively
that red meat does not cause cancer (26). In contrast, some published research
fingers refined sugars and excessive carbohydrates as the prime factors in cancer
(27).
Critics
also claim that eating a lot of animal protein will cause osteoporosis over time,
but controlled studies have not borne this belief out. (28) Another criticism
is that the increased protein intake on low-carb diets will hurt the kidneys or
contribute to kidney stone formation but, again, studies have not shown these
notions to be true. (29)
Many
believe that carbohydrates are necessary to maintain our energy levels, but the
body can utilize fatty acids for energy, as well as convert protein into glucose
on an as-needed basis. “The mitochondria in our cells, the organelles that generate
energy for us, are specifically designed to use fat for energy,” said Dr. Allan.
“Furthermore, many organs prefer fat as an energy source--not glucose,” he concluded.
Indeed, the heart prefers naturally saturated fatty acids for its energy needs,
not glucose (30).
Another
myth is that one needs to eat lots of fruits and vegetables to get enough vitamins
and minerals each day. But Dr. Allan counters that, “While we do get some vitamins
and minerals from plant foods, we can get more of them from animal foods. Even
more importantly, there are many vitamins and cofactors that we only get from
animal foods.” Dr. Allan also commented that the public are misled into thinking
that animal foods do not provide many nutrients because food-nutrient tables typically
exclude animal foods from their lists, listing only plant foods instead. The reality
is, however, that animal foods contain higher levels of almost every nutrient.
Vitamins like A and D are only found in animal foods and nutritional factors like
carnitine and CoQ10 are predominantly found in animal foods as well.
A
final criticism is that low-carb diets do not have long-term published research
testifying to their effectiveness, but this is not really true. Nutritional anthropological
research of such population groups as the Inuit and Masai have shown that these
heavy meat and fat eating peoples enjoy excellent health on their native diets
(31). Furthermore, Stefansson and his travel companion Karsten Andersen ate nothing
but a mixture of raw and cooked meat and fat for over one year in a monitored
experiment at New York’s Bellevue Hospital--with no ill-effects noted. Andersen’s
health actually improved! (32)
THE
FAT OF THE LAND
Despite
the pronouncements to the contrary, low-carb diets have much to offer beyond weight
loss. Before dismissing them as dangerous food fads, you should take a close and
unbiased look at the clinical and biochemical research that supports them to see
what benefit they could have for you.
About the Author: The
late Stephen Byrnes, PhD, RNCP, is the author of Diet & Heart Disease:
Its NOT What You Think and Digestion Made Simple (Whitman Books; 2001);
and The Lazy Person’s Whole Foods Cookbook (Ecclesia Life Mana; 2001).
RESOURCES
The
Weston A Price Foundation, www.WestonAPrice.org.
An organization devoted to disseminating Weston Price’s research and providing
accurate nutrition information. Local chapters are located in the USA, Canada,
Australia, and the United Kingdom.
All
of the books mentioned in this article are available from your local book seller
or online.
NOTES
1.
AB Savarin. Physiologie du Gout. Dtsch. Ausgabe: Bruckmann Querschnitte, Verlg.-Nr.
1152, F. Bruckmann KG, Munchen, 1962.
2.
W. Banting. Letters on Corpulence. London, Harrison, 1864.
3.
V. Stefansson. The Fat of the Land, New York, MacMillan Publishing, 1956.
4.
WA Price. Nutrition and Physical Degeneration, New Canaan, CT; Keats Publishing,
1997.
5.
R. Mackarness. Eat Fat and Grow Slim. Garden City, NY; Doubleday & Co., 1959.
6.
J Yudkin. Sweet and Dangerous. New York; Van Rees Press, 1972.
7.
RC Atkins. Dr. Atkins’ New Diet Revolution. New York; Avon Books, 2002, 57.
8.
S Fallon & MG Enig. “Tragedy and Hype: The Third International Soy Symposium.”
Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients, July, August 2001. Posted at http://www.westonaprice.org.
9.
(a) GD Foster, HR Wyatt, JO Hill, et al. Evaluation of the Atkins Diet: A randomized
controlled trial. Obes Res. 2001;9(suppl 3):O132; (b) WS Yancy, JR Guyton, RP
Bakst, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a very-low-carbohydrate diet with
nutritional supplements versus a low-fat/low-calorie diet. Obes Res. 2001;9(suppl
3):PG17. Summary article is posted at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/418266
10.
C Allan and W Lutz. Life Without Bread. New Canaan, CT.; Keats Publishing, 2000,
147.
11.
Ibid., 27.
12.
J Kwasniewski and M Chylinski. Homo Optimus. Poland; WGP Publishing House, 2002.
13.
Dr. Bogdan Sikorski, PhD, personal interview, June 12, 2002.
14.
D. Schwarzbein and N Deville. The Schwarzbein Pricnciple. Florida; HCI Communications,
1999.
15.
J Ross. The Diet Cure. New York; Penguin Books, 2000.
16.
R Audette and T Gilchrist. Neanderthin. New York; Jeremy Tarcher, Inc., 1999.
17.
M & M Eades. Protein Power. New York; Bantam Books, 1997
18.
M & M Eades. The Protein Power Lifeplan. New York; Bantam Books, 2000.
20.
R Crayhon. The Carnitine Miracle. New York; M Evans Publishing, 1999.
21.
RC Atkins. Dr. Atkins’ New Diet Revolution. New York; Avon Books, 2002, 57-58.
22.
U Ravnskov. The Cholesterol Myths. New Trends Publishing; Washington, D.C., 2000;
MG Enig. Know Your Fats: The Complete Primer on Fats and Cholesterol Bethesda
Press; Maryland, 2000, 76-81; R Smith and E Pinckney. Diet, Blood Cholesterol,
and Coronary Heart Disease: A Critical Review of the Literature. Vector Enterprises;
California, 1991; The Cholesterol Conspiracy. Warren Greene, Inc.; USA, 1991;
S Byrnes. Diet and Heart Disease: Its NOT What You Think. Whitman Books; 2001,
25-52; GV Mann, ed. Coronary Heart Disease: The Dietary Sense and Nonsense. Veritas
Society; London, 1993.
23.
SL Malhotra. Epidemiology of ischemic heart disease in India with special reference
to causation. Brit Hrt J, 29, 895-905, 1967.
24.
U Ravnskov. The Cholesterol Myths. New Trends Publishing; Washington, D.C., 2000.
25.
MG Enig et al. Dietary fat and cancer trends--a critique. Fed Proc, 1978, 37:2215.
26. JS Baghurst et al. Does red meat cause cancer? Aust J Nutr Diet, 1997, 54(4):S1-S44.27.
27.
(a) J. Witte et al. Diet and premenopausal bilateral breast cancer: a case control
study. Breast Canc Res & Treat, 1997, 42:243-251; (b) S. Francheschi et al.
Intake of macronutrients and risk for breast cancer. Lancet, 1996, 347:1351-6;
c) S. Francheschi et al. Food groups and risk of colo-rectal cancer in Italy.
Inter J Canc, 1997, 72:56-61; (d) S. Seely et al. Diet Related Diseases--The Modern
Epidemic (AVI Publishing; CT), 1985, 190-200; (e) WJ Lutz. The Colonisation of
Europe and our Western diseases. Med Hypoth 1995, 45:115-120.
28.
H. Spencer and L. Kramer. Factors contributing to osteoporosis. J Nutr, 1986,
116:316-319; Further studies of the effect of a high protein diet as meat on calcium
metabolism. Amer J Clin Nutr., 1983, 37:6: 924-9.
29.
J. Dwyer et al. Diet, indicators of kidney disease, and late mortality among older
persons in the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Amer J of Pub Health, 1994,
84:(8): 1299-1303.
30.
ML Garg. Lipids, 24 (1989):334-339.
31.
(a) WA Price, op cit., 59-73, 129-163; (b) HL Abrams. Vegetarianism: an anthropological/nutritional
evaluation. J Appl Nutr, 1980, 32:2:53-87.
32.
V Stefansson. “Adventures in Diet.” Harper’s Magazine, November, December, 1935,
January 1936; CW Lieb. The effects on human beings of a twelve months exclusive
meat diet. JAMA, July 6, 1929, 20-22.
Click
Here to
share this page with your friends, website visitors, ezine readers, social followers
and other online contacts.
Disclaimer:
Throughout this website, statements are made pertaining to the properties and/or
functions of food and/or nutritional products. These statements have not been
evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and these materials and products
are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.